Marginal Propensity To Save Mps

What Is Marginal Propensity to Save (MPS)?

Marginal Propensity to Save (MPS) is a Keynesian macroeconomic concept that measures how much of an incremental change in income is saved rather than spent. Formally:
– MPS = ΔS / ΔY
where ΔS is the change in savings and ΔY is the change in income. MPS ranges from 0 to 1. It is the complement of the marginal propensity to consume (MPC): MPC + MPS = 1.

Key takeaways

– MPS shows the fraction of each additional dollar of income that households save.
– MPS varies across income levels and over time; higher-income households tend to have higher MPS.
– MPS determines the size of the simple fiscal multiplier: multiplier = 1 / MPS (equivalently 1 / (1 − MPC)).
– Policymakers use estimates of MPS to predict how fiscal stimulus or tax changes will affect aggregate demand and GDP.
– MPS is an empirical concept — estimate it from observed changes in savings and income, or from regression analysis.

Example (simple numerical)

– You receive a $500 bonus. You spend $400 and save $100.
– ΔY = $500; ΔS = $100.
– MPS = 100 / 500 = 0.20.
– MPC = 400 / 500 = 0.80 (and MPC + MPS = 1).
– Fiscal multiplier (simple model) = 1 / MPS = 1 / 0.20 = 5. So, in the simplest Keynesian model, $1 of autonomous spending generates up to $5 of total income.

Understanding MPS — intuition and graphical view

– Intuition: MPS answers “If my income rises by $1, how much of that $1 do I save?” A higher MPS means more of extra income is saved (less spent).
– Graphically: Plot change in savings (vertical axis) vs. change in income (horizontal axis). The slope of the savings line is MPS.
– Income effects: As people satisfy basic needs, extra income is increasingly likely to be saved, so MPS tends to rise with income (though not universally or monotonically).

Relationship to MPC and the consumption function

– Consumption function (simple linear form): C = a + bY, where b = MPC.
– If MPC = b, then MPS = 1 − b.
– The simple Keynesian aggregate demand multiplier (no taxes, no imports) is:
– Multiplier = 1 / (1 − MPC) = 1 / MPS.
– Example: If MPC = 0.8 (MPS = 0.2), the multiplier = 5.

Why economists and policymakers care about MPS

– Predicting fiscal impact: Lower MPS (higher MPC) means fiscal stimulus has a larger short-run effect on aggregate demand via multiplier processes.
– Targeting policy: If low-income groups have lower MPS (higher MPC), directing transfers or stimulus to those groups can produce larger demand effects per dollar spent.
– Saving and investment analysis: MPS informs models that link saving behavior to long-run capital formation and interest rates.

Practical steps — how to calculate or estimate MPS

For an individual or household (simple):

1. Identify the change in income (ΔY) over the period (bonus, raise, one-time payment).
2. Identify the change in savings (ΔS) over the same period (increase in bank balances, retirement contributions).
3. Compute MPS = ΔS / ΔY and MPC = 1 − MPS.

For an economist or analyst using aggregate data:

1. Obtain time-series or cross-sectional data on aggregate income (Y) and aggregate saving (S) for the population of interest.
2. Compute period-to-period changes ΔY and ΔS (or use percentage changes depending on model).
3. Calculate sample MPS as ΣΔS / ΣΔY (simple average of changes) or compute the slope coefficient by regressing ΔS on ΔY:
– ΔS = α + β ΔY + ε, where β estimates MPS.
4. Check robustness: split sample by income groups, periods (recession vs expansion), or use instrumental variables if endogeneity is a concern.
5. Adjust for taxes, transfers, and imports in more detailed models; consider the marginal propensity to import (MPM) and marginal tax rates when computing effective multipliers.

For policymakers forecasting fiscal multipliers:

1. Estimate or adopt plausible MPS (or MPC) for target groups.
2. Compute multiplier = 1 / MPS (simple Keynesian case). If taxes and imports exist, use the expanded multiplier:
– Multiplier = 1 / (MPS + MPT + MPM)
where MPT is marginal propensity to pay taxes and MPM is marginal propensity to import.
3. Apply multiplier to proposed autonomous spending (ΔG or ΔI) to estimate ΔGDP = multiplier × Δ(autonomous spending).
4. Run sensitivity analysis across different MPS assumptions.

Factors that influence MPS (why it varies)

– Income level: higher incomes tend to have higher MPS (save a larger share of additional income).
– Liquidity constraints: credit-constrained households may have low MPS (they consume more of additional income to meet needs).
– Expectations: if households expect future income declines, they may increase MPS (precautionary saving).
– Wealth and interest rates: higher wealth or returns may change saving incentives.
– Cultural and institutional factors: social norms, retirement systems, and tax incentives affect saving behavior.
– Time horizon: short-run marginal tendencies can differ from long-run tendencies.

Limitations and caveats

– MPS is not fixed: it depends on context, period, household, and expectations.
– Simple multiplier formula ignores taxes, imports, supply constraints, and monetary policy reactions.
– Measurement issues: distinguishing between permanent and transitory income changes matters (permanent income hypothesis suggests different marginal propensities).
– Endogeneity: changes in savings and income can be simultaneously determined; simple correlations may mislead without careful identification.
– Aggregation: aggregate MPS masks large heterogeneity across households and income groups.

Practical advice — for households, economists, and policymakers

For households:

1. Track marginal uses of extra income: when you get higher income, record how much you allocate to spending, debt repayment, and saving.
2. Set a target marginal savings rate: plan to commit a portion of income increases to retirement, emergency funds, or paying down high-cost debt.
3. Use behavioral devices (automatic transfers, payroll contributions) to increase MPS if desired.

For economists/analysts:

1. Estimate MPS by subgroup (income deciles, age cohorts) to inform targeted policy recommendations.
2. Use regressions and robustness checks; control for taxes, transfers, and price effects.
3. Consider forward-looking models (life-cycle/permanent-income) to distinguish temporary vs permanent income changes.

For policymakers:

1. Target stimulus where MPC is high (MPS low) to maximize short-run demand impact (e.g., transfers to low-income households).
2. Account for leakages (imports, taxes) that raise effective MPS in the open economy.
3. Combine short-run demand stimulus with long-run measures that affect saving incentives and investment.

The bottom line

Marginal Propensity to Save (MPS) quantifies how much of an incremental dollar of income is saved rather than consumed. Because it varies across households and economic conditions, estimating MPS matters for predicting the impact of fiscal policy through the multiplier and for designing targeted stimulus. Simple calculations (MPS = ΔS / ΔY) are informative, but analysts and policymakers should account for taxes, imports, expectations, and heterogeneity when using MPS to guide decisions.

Sources

– Investopedia. “Marginal Propensity to Save (MPS).” https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/marginal-propensity-save.asp
– Encyclopædia Britannica. “Propensity to Save.”

Continuing from the previous discussion, below are additional sections that expand on marginal propensity to save (MPS), provide worked examples, practical steps for calculation and application, discuss limitations and empirical patterns, and close with a short summary.

How to calculate MPS: step-by-step practical guide

1. Assemble data:
– Obtain measures of income and savings for the period(s) you want to analyze (household survey data, national accounts, company payroll changes, etc.).
2. Choose the change to examine:
– Identify the marginal change in income (ΔY). This could be a one-time bonus, a raise, or the difference between two consecutive periods.
3. Measure the change in savings:
– Compute ΔS, the change in total saving over the same interval. Saving = Income − Consumption.
4. Compute MPS:
– MPS = ΔS / ΔY.
5. Compute MPC (optional):
– MPC = ΔC / ΔY, or MPC = 1 − MPS (where ΔC is change in consumption).
6. Interpret and test:
– Check whether results are plausible (0 ≤ MPS ≤ 1 for simple cases). Consider doing sensitivity analysis with different ΔY sizes and across income groups.

Worked numerical examples

Example 1 — simple bonus

– Scenario: You receive a $1,000 bonus. You spend $750 and deposit $250 in savings.
– ΔY = $1,000; ΔS = $250.
– MPS = 250 / 1,000 = 0.25.
– MPC = 750 / 1,000 = 0.75.
– Keynesian multiplier = 1 / MPS = 1 / 0.25 = 4 (or 1 / (1 − MPC) = 1 / (1 − 0.75) = 4).
Interpretation: Each dollar saved reduces the immediate consumption response; with MPS = 0.25, a $1 increase in autonomous spending potentially multiplies to $4 in total output (in the simplest closed-economy model without taxes or imports).

Example 2 — change by income group

– Low-income household: on a $200 raise, spends $180 and saves $20 → MPS = 0.10.
– High-income household: on a $200 raise, spends $50 and saves $150 → MPS = 0.75.
Interpretation: Higher-income households often have higher MPS (save a larger share of additional income), while lower-income households tend to have higher MPCs.

Using MPS to calculate the spending multiplier

– Formula: Expenditure multiplier = 1 / MPS.
– Example: If empirical MPS = 0.2 → multiplier = 5. That implies an initial $100 million fiscal stimulus could raise aggregate output by roughly $500 million in the simplified model.

MPS versus average propensity to save (APS)

– MPS (marginal) measures the change in saving from an incremental change in income: ΔS/ΔY.
– APS (average) measures total saving relative to total income: S / Y.
– They differ: a household could have a low APS but a higher MPS (or vice versa). Marginal behavior matters for multiplier effects and short-run stimulus impact.

Factors that determine MPS (empirical drivers)

– Income level: higher incomes typically correlate with higher MPS.
– Age/lifecycle stage: young workers may borrow/consume more (lower MPS), middle-aged may save more for retirement or mortgages, retirees may dissave.
– Credit access: easy access to credit can reduce saving out of additional income.
– Expectations: if people expect future income declines, they might save more (higher MPS) out of a current gain (precautionary saving).
– Taxes and transfers: marginal tax rates and social safety nets affect the net marginal income and thus MPS.
– Cultural and institutional factors: norms and pension systems influence saving behavior.

Policy applications and practical steps for policymakers

– Fiscal stimulus design:
– If MPS is high in the population (small MPC), direct government transfers aimed at higher-income households produce less immediate consumption stimulus.
– Target transfers to groups with high MPC (low MPS) to maximize near-term demand stimulus.
– Designing multipliers:
– Use empirical estimates of MPS by income bracket and incorporate tax and import leakages (see next section) to estimate real-world multipliers.
– Simulation steps:
1. Estimate MPS/MPC for relevant population segments (household surveys, administrative data).
2. Adjust for taxes, transfers, and marginal propensity to import.
3. Model multiplier effects and feedbacks (including interest rate responses).
4. Conduct sensitivity checks and scenario analysis.

Limitations and adjustments in real-world applications

– Leakages beyond saving:
– In open economies, part of any additional income is spent on imports; the marginal propensity to import (MPI) acts as an additional leakage that reduces the domestic multiplier.
– Taxes reduce the disposable income change; use marginal tax rates to compute ΔY after taxes.
– Nonlinearities and changing MPS:
– MPS is not constant over large income changes or over time. For large transfers or long-term shifts, behavior may change.
– Time horizons:
– Short-run MPS may differ from long-run MPS because households adjust durable purchases, debt, and saving over time.
– Measurement challenges:
– Observing true ΔS and ΔY requires clean data and careful accounting (e.g., distinguishing temporary vs permanent income changes).
– Behavioral models:
– The permanent income hypothesis and life-cycle hypothesis predict that people respond more to permanent income changes than to temporary ones — that affects the observed MPS.

MPS in more complex macro models

– Taxes and transfers: Use disposable-income versions of MPC/MPS: MPS_d = ΔS / ΔYD, where YD is disposable income (after taxes/transfers).
– Open-economy multiplier: Roughly 1 / (MPS + MPI + MPT), where MPI is marginal propensity to import and MPT is marginal propensity to tax — this shows combined leakages.
– Interest rates and crowding out: If fiscal expansion raises interest rates, private investment may fall (partial or full crowding out), changing effective multipliers.
– Endogenous consumption responses: Some models let MPC vary with wealth, credit markets, or expectations; simulations often employ distributions of MPC/MPS across households.

Empirical evidence and stylized facts

– Cross-country and cross-income studies often find:
– Lower-income households have higher MPC (lower MPS) for small, predictable income changes.
– Liquidity constraints increase MPC: credit-constrained households spend a higher share of extra income.
– Large or permanent income changes produce stronger consumption responses than small, temporary ones (aligns with permanent income hypothesis).
– Policy evaluations:
– Direct transfers to low-income households (who have low MPS) typically generate larger short-run boosts to consumption than equivalent transfers to high-income households.

Practical examples for businesses and individuals

– Business planning:
– Firms can forecast demand changes from wage increases in their customer base by estimating local MPS: lower MPS means higher likely increases in consumption demand from wage growth.
– Personal finance:
– Understanding your own MPS can guide saving and debt-reduction strategies. If your MPS is very low and you want to increase savings, consider automated transfers to savings accounts following raises.

How to estimate MPS from available data (practical tips)

– Use microdata (household surveys) to compute changes in reported income and savings across periods.
– Use experimental data (cash-transfer experiments) to identify short-run MPC/MPS.
– For national accounts, carefully separate consumption, gross saving, and transfers when computing ΔS/ΔY.
– Prefer disposable income (after-tax) for most policy-relevant MPS estimates.

Additional illustrative example — fiscal policy scenario

– Government considers a $10 billion increase in infrastructure spending.
– Suppose the economy’s average MPS = 0.2 and the average MPI = 0.1. Ignoring taxation for simplicity, combined leakage = 0.2 + 0.1 = 0.3.
– Effective multiplier (approximate) = 1 / 0.3 ≈ 3.33.
– Estimated total increase in GDP ≈ $10 billion × 3.33 = $33.3 billion.
Interpretation: Real-world multipliers are approximate and sensitive to assumptions about leakages and additional behavioral responses (prices, interest rates, capacity constraints).

Common misunderstandings about MPS

– “MPS always between 0 and 1”: often true in basic analysis, but in some cases (dissaving or negative saving) ΔS can be negative, giving negative MPS for that interval. Also, for very wealthy households that increase borrowing when income rises (uncommon), results could appear anomalous.
– “MPS is constant”: not true — MPS varies by income, time, and context.
– “High MPS is always bad for the economy”: higher saving can reduce short-run aggregate demand but increases resources for investment and long-run growth; effects depend on context and how savings are used.

Concluding summary

– The marginal propensity to save (MPS) measures the share of an incremental change in income that is saved rather than spent: MPS = ΔS / ΔY.
– MPS is the complement of the marginal propensity to consume (MPC); MPC + MPS = 1 in the simplest closed-economy setup without taxes or imports.
– MPS is a key input in estimating Keynesian spending multipliers (multiplier ≈ 1 / MPS) and in assessing the likely short-run effectiveness of fiscal stimulus.
– MPS varies across income groups, life-cycle stages, expectations, taxes, and in open economies with import leakages.
– Practical use requires careful measurement (use disposable income, account for taxes/imports), sensitivity checks, and recognition of behavioral and institutional complexities.
– For policy, targeting transfers to people with low MPS (high MPC) tends to produce larger short-term increases in consumption; but long-run considerations about investment, growth, and savings behavior should also guide decisions.

If you want, I can:

– Provide an Excel-ready template to compute MPS, MPC, and multipliers from raw income and consumption data.
– Run sample calculations for different countries or income brackets using public data sources.
– Summarize empirical estimates of MPS/MPC from academic studies.

[[END]]