Key takeaways
– The EBIT/EV multiple — EBIT divided by enterprise value (EV) — is an “earnings yield” that shows operating earnings as a percentage of the total value of the business.
– It normalizes for capital structure and tax differences by using operating profit (EBIT) and enterprise value, making cross-company comparisons cleaner than some profit ratios.
– Higher EBIT/EV (a higher earnings yield) is generally preferable, but the metric has limits (doesn’t adjust for depreciation/amortization, one‑time items, or required reinvestment).
– Use EBIT/EV as a screening/relative‑valuation tool together with other measures (EV/EBITDA, FCF yield, ROIC) and with a careful adjustment process.
What is the EBIT/EV multiple?
– Definition: EBIT/EV = Earnings Before Interest and Taxes ÷ Enterprise Value.
– Conceptually it answers: “What percentage of the total value of the company do its recurring operating earnings represent?” It was popularized by value investors (notably Joel Greenblatt) as a way to measure earnings yield while accounting for debt and cash.
Key formulas
– EBIT/EV = EBIT ÷ Enterprise Value
– Enterprise Value (common form) = Market Capitalization + Total Debt – Cash and Cash Equivalents
(Some practitioners also add minority interest and preferred equity when present.)
Why use EBIT/EV? (Benefits)
– Capital-structure neutral: EV incorporates debt and cash, so two companies with identical operating earnings but different leverage are compared on the same basis.
– Removes tax-rate distortions: EBIT is pre-tax, so differences in corporate tax rates don’t distort comparisons.
– Simple earnings yield: Useful as a screening metric to identify companies that generate high operating earnings relative to their total value.
Important limitations
– Depreciation and amortization: EBIT includes D&A, which can be treated differently across firms and industries. For asset-heavy businesses, EV/EBITDA may be preferable.
– Non-operating items and one-offs: EBIT should be normalized for extraordinary items, gains/losses, and unusual accounting adjustments.
– Reinvestment needs not considered: High EBIT doesn’t guarantee free cash flow — capital expenditure and working capital requirements can change the economics.
– Industry differences: Capital intensity, growth profile, and cyclical exposure mean you should compare only similar companies or adjust expectations.
Step-by-step: how to calculate and use EBIT/EV
1. Choose the period and measure of EBIT
– Use trailing twelve months (TTM) EBIT or normalized/pro forma EBIT (adjust for one‑offs, large nonrecurring gains/losses or unusual tax items).
2. Collect market data
– Market capitalization (current) = share price × shares outstanding.
– Total debt = short‑term debt + long‑term debt (from balance sheet).
– Cash and cash equivalents (from balance sheet).
– Add minority interest and preferred stock if material.
3. Compute Enterprise Value
– EV = Market cap + Total debt + Preferred stock + Minority interest – Cash.
4. Calculate the ratio
– EBIT/EV = EBIT ÷ EV. Express as decimal or percentage (multiply by 100).
5. Interpret the result
– Higher EBIT/EV = higher earnings yield (potentially cheaper relative to operating earnings).
– Compare across peers or historical ranges, not in isolation.
6. Adjust and triangulate
– Normalize earnings, check for heavy D&A, evaluate capex needs, and compare with EV/EBITDA, FCF yield, and ROIC.
7. Run sensitivity tests
– See how changes in EBIT, debt, cash, and share price affect the yield.
Worked example (illustrative)
– Company X
– TTM EBIT = $50 million
– Market cap = $700 million
– Total debt = $50 million
– Cash = $150 million
– EV = 700 + 50 − 150 = $600 million
– EBIT/EV = 50 / 600 = 0.0833 = 8.33%
– Company Z
– TTM EBIT = $50 million
– Market cap = $900 million
– Total debt = $350 million
– Cash = $150 million
– EV = 900 + 350 − 150 = $1,100 million
– EBIT/EV = 50 / 1,100 = 0.0455 = 4.55%
Interpretation of this example
– Company X shows a higher earnings yield (8.33% vs 4.55%). Part of the difference comes from Company Z’s higher leverage (larger debt), which increases EV and lowers the EBIT/EV yield even though operating earnings are equal.
– A higher yield is attractive from a value perspective, but you must ask whether the earnings are sustainably achievable and whether required reinvestment (capex) or other risks could impair free cash flow.
When to prefer EBIT/EV vs alternatives
– Use EBIT/EV when you want operating earnings pre-tax and capital‑structure neutrality.
– Use EV/EBITDA if you want to reduce the impact of differing depreciation/amortization policies (EBITDA removes D&A).
– Use FCF yield (Free Cash Flow ÷ EV) to focus on cash profitability rather than accounting earnings.
– Use ROIC/ROE for return-on-investment comparisons; these metrics answer different questions (efficiency vs valuation).
Practical checklist before relying on EBIT/EV
– Normalize EBIT for one-time items and restructuring charges.
– Confirm that D&A accounting differences aren’t driving the result (consider EV/EBITDA for asset-heavy firms).
– Check capital expenditure needs and working capital trends to assess conversion of EBIT to cash.
– Review leverage levels and maturity profile of debt — a low yield with short-dated heavy debt may be risky.
– Compare only to industry peers or historical company values.
– Combine with qualitative analysis: competitive advantage, growth prospects, management quality.
Common pitfalls and how to avoid them
– Blind screening: Don’t pick stocks solely on a single high EBIT/EV figure. Follow up with deeper cash-flow and balance-sheet analysis.
– Ignoring cyclical earnings: For cyclical firms, EBIT can be volatile; use multi-year averages or cycle-adjusted EBIT.
– Failing to adjust for accounting distortions: Excessive non-operating income or accounting changes can mislead.
– Overlooking off-balance-sheet items: Lease obligations, operating commitments, and pension liabilities can affect enterprise value if material.
Practical use cases
– Value screens: Identify firms with high EBIT/EV as candidate value investments.
– Deal evaluation: Private acquirers and LBO analysts use EV-based multiples to compare acquisition targets.
– Relative valuation: Compare peers within the same industry to find cheaper operating-earnings generators.
Conclusion
EBIT/EV is a compact, capital-structure–aware earnings-yield measure that’s useful for relative valuation and screening. It’s most powerful when earnings are normalized and it is used alongside other metrics (EV/EBITDA, FCF yield, ROIC) and qualitative analysis. Watch for depreciation/amortization differences, required reinvestment, and one‑time accounting events that can distort the picture.
Sources and further reading
– Investopedia — “EBIT/EV Multiple” (source article overview): https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/ebit-ev-multiple.asp
– Joel Greenblatt — “The Little Book That Beats the Market” (discussion of earnings yield and value investing concepts)
Continuing the explanation of the EBIT/EV multiple, below you’ll find additional sections with practical steps, more numerical examples, adjustments and caveats, screening and implementation guidance, and a concise conclusion.
What the EBIT/EV Multiple Measures (recap)
– Formula: EBIT/EV = Earnings Before Interest and Taxes (EBIT) ÷ Enterprise Value (EV).
– Interpretation: The ratio is an “earnings yield” — the pre‑interest, pre‑tax earnings earned per dollar of enterprise value. Higher values indicate a higher earnings yield (potentially better value), all else equal.
How to Compute EBIT and EV — Practical Steps
1. Collect operating earnings:
– Use EBIT: operating profit before interest and tax. You can use trailing twelve months (TTM) EBIT or a normalized/adjusted EBIT (see adjustments below).
2. Calculate Enterprise Value (EV):
– EV = Market capitalization + Total debt (short + long-term) + Minority interest + Preferred stock − Cash and cash equivalents.
– Note: under modern accounting, capitalize lease liabilities (if not already) to include them in debt-like obligations.
3. Compute the ratio:
– EBIT/EV = EBIT ÷ EV. Express as a decimal or percentage (multiply by 100).
4. Compare across peers, sectors, or historical medians to assess relative attractiveness.
Worked Example 1 — Illustrative Companies X and Z
– Company X:
– Market cap = $500 million
– Total debt = $50 million
– Cash = $30 million
– EV = 500 + 50 − 30 = $520 million
– EBIT (TTM) = $40 million
– EBIT/EV = 40 ÷ 520 = 0.0769 → 7.69% earnings yield
– Company Z:
– Market cap = $1,000 million
– Total debt = $200 million
– Cash = $50 million
– EV = 1,000 + 200 − 50 = $1,150 million
– EBIT (TTM) = $50 million
– EBIT/EV = 50 ÷ 1,150 = 0.0435 → 4.35% earnings yield
Interpretation: Company X shows a higher EBIT/EV yield (≈7.7% vs. 4.4%) because it has a smaller EV relative to EBIT — driven by lower market cap and/or less leverage — and thus appears cheaper on an operating-earnings basis.
Worked Example 2 — Effect of Leverage
– Same EBIT ($40 million) but different debt levels:
– Company A: Market cap = $600M, Debt = $20M, Cash = $30M → EV = 590M → EBIT/EV = 6.78%
– Company B: Market cap = $600M, Debt = $200M, Cash = $30M → EV = 770M → EBIT/EV = 5.19%
– Conclusion: Higher debt increases EV and lowers the EBIT/EV yield, reflecting higher financial risk.
Adjustments and Normalizations (practical guidance)
– Use normalized EBIT: Smooth out one-off gains/losses and cyclical swings by using average EBIT over 3–5 years or adjusted TTM EBIT.
– Remove nonrecurring items: Exclude unusual gains/losses that distort operating earnings.
– Consider depreciation/amortization effects: EBIT still includes D&A, which can vary across firms with different asset ages and accounting policies. If D&A differences are material, consider EV/EBITDA or adjust EBIT for meaningful noncash items.
– Capitalization of leases & operating obligations: Under current standards, many operating leases are recognized on balance sheets — ensure EV includes these liabilities if they are not already embedded.
– Off‑balance sheet items and contingent liabilities: Add significant contingent liabilities or pension deficits to EV when material.
When to Use EBIT/EV vs. Alternatives
– EBIT/EV is helpful when:
– You want an earnings yield that neutralizes differences in tax rates and interest expense (capital structure).
– Comparing companies across different leverage profiles.
– Alternatives to consider:
– EV/EBITDA — removes D&A differences and is commonly used for capital-intensive businesses.
– EV/Sales — useful when earnings are negative or inconsistent.
– Price/Earnings (P/E) or FCF Yield — useful for equity-only perspectives or cash-generation focus.
– No single metric suffices; use EBIT/EV alongside return measures (ROIC, ROE), free cash flow, leverage ratios, and qualitative factors.
Interpreting the Ratio — Practical Rules of Thumb
– Higher EBIT/EV is generally better for value investors (higher yield), but context matters:
– Industry norms: Capital-intensive industries often have lower yields; compare to peer medians.
– Growth prospects: A lower yield may be justified by higher expected growth.
– Quality and sustainability of earnings: Validate that EBIT is recurring and supported by cash flow.
– Watch for red flags:
– Very high yields but deteriorating revenues, margins, or cash flow.
– Negative EV (rare) or negative EBIT — interpret carefully and usually avoid simple comparisons in these cases.
– Large one-time gains inflating EBIT temporarily.
Screening and Implementation Steps (practical workflow)
1. Define investment universe (sector, market-cap range, geography).
2. Pull financial data (TTM EBIT, market-cap, debt, cash, minority interests, preferred stock).
3. Compute EV and EBIT/EV for each company.
4. Filter by thresholds or percentiles (e.g., top 10–20% by EBIT/EV yield within sector).
5. Qualify candidates — perform fundamental due diligence:
– Check earnings quality and cash flow conversion.
– Review balance-sheet health (debt maturities, interest coverage).
– Assess competitive position, margins, and growth drivers.
6. Cross-check with other metrics (EV/EBITDA, ROIC, FCF yield).
7. Consider valuation relative to intrinsic value or expected return requirements.
8. Construct a diversified portfolio and monitor changes in EBIT/EV over time.
Limitations and Common Pitfalls
– D&A distortions: Companies with heavy historical capex and high D&A can appear less attractive than they are (consider EBITDA-based metrics).
– Accounting differences: Different accounting policies can make EBIT comparisons imperfect.
– Cyclicality: EBIT can be volatile in cyclical industries — use multi-year averages.
– Capital structure and credit risk: EBIT/EV can understate the risk of highly leveraged firms if debt covenants or refinancing risk are ignored.
– Growth: A high EBIT/EV yield does not guarantee growth; it could signal stagnation or a distressed business.
How Investors (and Joel Greenblatt) Use EBIT/EV
– Joel Greenblatt popularized using earnings yield (EBIT/EV) combined with return on capital (e.g., EBIT/IC) in his “magic formula” approach — screening for above-average returns and cheap valuations.
– Combining a high EBIT/EV ranking with a high-quality ranking (e.g., ROIC) aims to find companies that are both cheap and efficient at converting capital into earnings.
Advanced Considerations
– Enterprise Value adjustments: For a more conservative EV, add long-term operating liabilities, pension deficits, unfunded obligations, and the present value of off-balance-sheet lease commitments.
– Forward-looking EBIT: Some investors use forward EBIT estimates (analyst consensus) to compute forward EBIT/EV yields, but this introduces forecasting risk.
– Tax and jurisdictional differences: EBIT is pre-tax, so differences in tax rates across countries remain relevant for net returns — consider after-tax cash flows when valuing.
Concluding Summary
The EBIT/EV multiple is a useful earnings-yield metric that helps investors compare operating profitability relative to the total economic value of a company, taking debt and cash into account. Its strengths lie in normalizing across capital structures and tax regimes; its weaknesses include sensitivity to depreciation, accounting differences, and one-off items. Use EBIT/EV as part of a multi-metric approach: calculate normalized EBIT, carefully compute EV including lease and contingent liabilities, compare within industries, and cross-check with cash-flow metrics and qualitative assessments. For many value investors, combining EBIT/EV with return-on-capital measures yields a balanced picture of cheapness and quality.
Sources and further reading
– Investopedia, “EBIT/EV Multiple” (source material)
– Joel Greenblatt, The Little Book That Still Beats the Market (Magic Formula investing)
– Standard financial statement and accounting references for EV and EBIT definitions
[[END]]