Arms length

Updated: September 25, 2025

Title: What an Arm’s Length Transaction Means—and Why it Matters

Definition
An arm’s length transaction is a deal between parties who are independent of one another and who negotiate on their own behalf without outside pressure or special relationship ties. In such transactions, the agreed price is expected to reflect what unrelated, neutral buyers and sellers would accept in the open market. “Fair market value” (FMV) is the term used for that hypothetical market price.

Why this matters
Arm’s length status affects taxes, lending, legal compliance, and market pricing. Lenders rely on arm’s length sales to judge collateral value. Tax authorities treat related-party deals differently because family members, affiliated companies, or other connected parties may set prices that don’t reflect market reality. For multinational corporations, ensuring intercompany sales follow arm’s length prices—called transfer pricing—is crucial so each tax jurisdiction receives the appropriate tax revenue.

How to tell arm’s length vs non-arm’s length
– Arm’s length: unrelated parties, independent negotiation, access to the same information, no pressure or special favors, price consistent with comparables.
– Non-arm’s length (also called related-party or arm-in-arm): family members, business affiliates, parent/subsidiary relationships, or prior agreements that influence terms (e.g., discounts, special payment terms).

How arm’s length links to fair market value (FMV)
FMV is the price an impartial buyer and seller would agree upon when both are reasonably informed and not under compulsion. An arm’s length sale is the main evidence used to establish FMV. Conversely, a related-party sale can be adjusted by tax authorities to FMV if the declared price appears influenced by the relationship.

Practical consequences (short list)
– Taxes: Authorities may substitute FMV for the reported price when calculating gains, deductions, or transfer-pricing adjustments.
– Lending: Banks may discount collateral values from a related-party sale.
– Market comps: Public sales between unrelated parties are used to derive comparable values in real estate and business valuations.

Step-by-step checklist to evaluate a transaction (use this before you sign)
1. Identify relationships: Are the buyer and seller family, business affiliates, or otherwise connected?
2. Assess negotiation independence: Were terms negotiated at arm’s length or prearranged?
3. Compare market data: Are there comparable sales in the same market/timeframe that support the price?
4. Document information access: Did both sides have equal access to property or business information?
5. Get an independent valuation if uncertain: A third-party appraiser or valuation specialist can support FMV.
6. Keep records: Save offers, communications, appraisal reports, and any disclosures for tax or lender review.
7. Disclose related-party status to relevant parties (lenders, tax advisors, regulators) as required.

Worked numeric example
Assumptions:
– Seller’s tax basis in a house: $200,000 (what the seller paid originally).
– Market evidence shows FMV is $350,000.
– An unrelated buyer pays $350,000 (arm’s length sale).
– A related buyer (the seller’s child) pays $275,000 (non-arm’s length sale).

Consequences:
– If sold at FMV ($350,000), taxable gain = 350,000 − 200,000 = $150,000.
– If sold to the child at $275,000, reported gain = 275,000 − 200,000 = $75,000.
– Tax authority action: They may ignore the $275,000 related-party price and impute the $350,000 FMV when calculating tax, resulting in an additional imputed gain of $75,000 (150,000 − 75,000). The seller could owe tax on that additional amount depending on tax rules and any exemptions.

Note: This example simplifies tax computations (no exclusions, exemptions, or rates applied). Actual tax effects depend on local law and filing details.

Transfer pricing (multinational context)
When related companies in different countries transact, tax authorities require that intercompany prices be set as if the parties were independent. This is to prevent profit shifting and ensure each jurisdiction collects appropriate tax. International guidance and many tax codes require documentation demonstrating that prices are consistent with arm’s length principles.

Common examples of non-arm’s length transactions
– Sales between parents and children or between siblings.
– Transfers between a parent company and its subsidiaries.
– Sales where one party gives unusually favorable financing or other concessions because of the relationship.
– Transactions with longstanding business partners where prior agreements affect price or terms.

Quick documentation checklist sellers and buyers should keep
– Signed purchase agreement and all offers/counteroffers.
– Comparable sales data and appraisal reports.
– Records of communications showing negotiation steps.
– Any disclosures of related-party status or financing terms.

Sources (for further reading)
– Investopedia — Arm’s Length Transaction: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/armslength.asp
– OECD — Transfer Pricing Guidelines: https://www.oecd.org/tax/transfer-pricing/transfer-pricing-guidelines.htm
– Internal Revenue Service (IRS) — Transfer Pricing: https://www.irs.gov/businesses/international-businesses/transfer-pricing
– Internal Revenue Service (IRS) — Fair Market Value (general guidance): https://www.irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/fair-market-value

Educational disclaimer
This explainer is for educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal, tax, or investment advice. For decisions that affect taxes, financing, or regulatory compliance, consult a qualified professional who can consider your specific situation.