Earnout

What is an earnout?
An earnout is a contractual provision in a business sale that makes a portion of the purchase price contingent on the acquired business hitting specified future performance targets. Typical targets include revenue, gross margin, EBITDA, net income, customer retention, or product milestones. Earnouts bridge valuation gaps: buyers reduce upfront risk, sellers share in upside if the business performs well after closing.

Key takeaways
– Earnouts tie part of consideration to future performance, aligning seller incentives with the buyer’s interests.
– Metrics, measurement periods, payment mechanics, governance and accounting/tax classification must be clearly defined to avoid disputes.
– Properly structured earnouts can motivate sellers and share risk; poorly drafted ones commonly lead to litigation.
– Accounting and tax treatment depend on classification (purchase consideration vs. compensation for services) and the applicable standards/jurisdictions.

Understanding an earnout — the essentials
– Purpose: Close deals when buyer and seller disagree on value or when future performance is uncertain (e.g., new products, volatile markets).
– Common metrics: Revenue, bookings, gross profit, EBITDA or adjusted EBITDA, customer- or usage-based metrics, regulatory or product milestones.
– Payouts: Usually cash but may be stock or a mix. Payments are typically made after the relevant measurement period.
– Period: Often 1–3 years, sometimes longer for long-term projects or milestone-based deals.
– Who it affects: Sellers (founders/owners) and sometimes key employees who remain employed during the earnout period.

How an earnout is typically structured
Key elements to negotiate and document:
1. Performance metric(s)
– Specify the exact metric (e.g., “consolidated net revenue” or “non‑GAAP adjusted EBITDA”), how it’s calculated, and any adjustments (normalizing items, one-offs).
2. Measurement period and frequency
– Define the start/end dates, whether annual or cumulative targets apply, and interim reporting.
3. Formula and payout schedule
– Define the exact formula (e.g., X% of revenue above $Y for three years), caps/floors, minimums, accelerators, and timing of payment.
4. Payment form and currency
– Cash, equity, escrow, or a mix; treatment if buyer is public/private and share price volatilities.
5. Accounting policies and normalization rules
– Lock in GAAP/IFRS or specified adjustments and require consistency with pre‑closing accounting policies to prevent manipulation.
6. Governance and operational covenants
– Require buyer to operate the business in the ordinary course and restrict actions that could unfairly depress performance (e.g., shedding assets, withholding marketing).
7. Key persons and employment covenants
– Identify essential employees and define obligations (e.g., non-compete, minimum time commitment), with remedies if they depart.
8. Information, auditing and dispute resolution
– Seller access to books, independent accountant audit rights, and steps for resolving calculation disputes (internal escalation → independent expert → arbitration/litigation).
9. Security and enforcement
– Escrow holdbacks, indemnity caps, and security interests to secure potential earnout payments.
10. Change of control and termination events
– Treatment in case of a sale, bankruptcy, insolvency, or material adverse change; whether earnouts accelerate, vest, or terminate.

Advantages and disadvantages

Advantages for the buyer
– Reduces upfront cash outlay and risk when future performance uncertain.
– Aligns seller incentives with post‑closing performance.
– Can protect buyer from overpaying if targets not met.

Advantages for the seller
– Potentially higher total consideration if the business performs well.
– Continued upside tied to business growth; can spread tax burden over time.

Disadvantages / risks
– For sellers: dependency on buyer’s post‑closing operating decisions; risk that earnout targets are missed due to buyer conduct or unforeseen events.
– For buyers: must accommodate seller involvement post‑closing; potential for seller management to resist new policies or distort results to maximize earnout.
– For both: disputes over accounting treatments, definitions, and operational changes—often resulting in costly arbitration or litigation.

Example: EA and PopCap (real-world illustration)
– In 2011 Electronic Arts announced acquisition of PopCap for $650 million cash + $100 million stock + a multi‑year earnout that could bring the total to $1.3 billion, contingent on PopCap achieving specific non‑GAAP EBIT targets over a multi‑year period. This aligned payment with future performance and limited EA’s upfront exposure while giving PopCap upside if post‑closing profits materialized. (Sources: Electronic Arts press release; TechCrunch coverage.)

Accounting treatment — what to expect
– IFRS: If an earnout is part of the consideration transferred for the business (contingent consideration), it is measured at fair value at acquisition date and included in the calculation of goodwill. If it is compensation for post‑combination services, it is expensed in profit or loss post‑combination and not included in goodwill. (See IFRS 3 guidance and professional firm analyses.)
– US GAAP (ASC 805): Contingent consideration recognized at fair value on the acquisition date as part of the purchase price. Subsequent measurement depends on whether the contingent consideration is classified as equity (no remeasurement) or a liability (remeasured and changes generally recognized in earnings). (See ASC 805 and KPMG/Big Four guidance.)
– Practical point: Explicitly state the intended accounting classification and the assumptions used in valuation in the purchase agreement and obtain valuation support at closing.

Tax treatment — high level
– Tax treatment depends on whether payments are characterized as part of the purchase price (capital gain for seller in many jurisdictions) or as compensation for services (ordinary income subject to payroll taxes).
– Determination often depends on facts: whether payments are contingent solely on business performance or on a seller’s services, whether seller remains employed, and how the agreement allocates payments among assets.
– Practical advice: Work with tax counsel to structure and document the treatment; consider seller withholding, estimated tax payments, and potential disputes with tax authorities.

Earnout vs. holdback — key difference
– Earnout: Additional payment contingent on future performance targets (rewards upside).
– Holdback (escrow): A portion of purchase price retained to satisfy post‑closing indemnity claims, purchase price adjustments, or undisclosed liabilities. Typically not tied to business performance; intended as security for buyers, often released after a fixed period or after claims expire.

Practical steps to structure, negotiate and implement an effective earnout

For buyers (step‑by‑step)
1. Establish objectives: Why use an earnout? Is it to bridge valuation gaps, incentivize retention, or de‑risk risky revenue streams?
2. Select robust, measurable metrics: Prefer objective financial metrics with clear, auditable inputs. Avoid vague operational measures unless clearly defined.
3. Limit complexity: Use a small number of metrics; complex multi‑metric formulas create ambiguity and disputes.
4. Lock accounting policies: Require consistency with existing accounting policies and pre‑closing treatment; specify permitted adjustments.
5. Include ordinary course covenants: Prevent the buyer from taking actions that could impair earnout achievement.
6. Define information and audit rights: Regular reporting and independent audit or accountant review; fast dispute escalation.
7. Cap and floor exposure: Set maximum payout and minimum guaranteed payments (if any).
8. Address employee retention: Negotiate employment terms for seller/key employees and define remedies if they leave.
9. Provide security where appropriate: Escrow, parent guarantees, or lien arrangements to secure contingent payments.
10. Plan for exit scenarios: Define what happens to the earnout on change of control, IPO, bankruptcy, or dissolution.

For sellers (step‑by‑step)
1. Insist on clear metric definitions: Avoid ambiguous adjustments; require transparent calculation mechanics.
2. Push for operational protections: Covenants requiring the business to be operated in the ordinary course and prohibitions on actions that would purposely depress results.
3. Seek employment protections: Define role, responsibilities, time commitment and compensation, plus agreed consequences if buyer materially changes seller’s role.
4. Negotiate fair accounting rules: Fix accounting policies and disallow unilateral changes that materially affect metrics.
5. Secure reporting and audit rights: Require timely reports and independent verification; define remedial mechanisms if calculations are disputed.
6. Ask for a reasonable cap and payment schedule: Ensure present value and timing are acceptable; consider partial upfront payment if possible.
7. Protect tax outcomes: Seek structure and documentation that supports capital gain treatment where favorable and practical.
8. Consider escrow length and release mechanics: Ensure holdbacks or escrow terms aren’t overly punitive.
9. Get dispute resolution mechanisms: Independent expert determination or binding arbitration as efficient options.

Drafting considerations and sample clauses to insist on
– Definitions section: Precisely define each term (e.g., “Net Revenue,” “Adjusted EBITDA,” “Bookings”).
– Calculation examples: Include pro forma examples showing payout calculations under several realistic scenarios.
– Accounting methodology clause: State that “Accounting policies and methods used during the Measurement Period shall be materially consistent with those used in the fiscal year ended [date], with only the following permitted adjustments…”
– Ordinary course covenant: “Buyer shall operate the Acquired Business in the ordinary course consistent with past practice and shall not take any action reasonably expected to materially reduce Net Revenue.”
– Audit and dispute resolution clause: “Seller shall have the right to an independent audit by [named firm] at Buyer’s expense if Seller disputes the calculation; disputes unresolved within 60 days shall be submitted to binding arbitration under [rules].”
– Change of control treatment: “If Buyer experiences a Change of Control during the Earnout Period, the Earnout shall [accelerate/pay pro rata/terminate] as follows…”
– Termination triggers and remedies: Define events that void or accelerate payments (e.g., insolvency, liquidation, material breach).

Common pitfalls and how to avoid them
– Vague definitions: Cure by precise definitions, examples, and formulaic calculations.
– Permitting buyer to alter business: Cure with restrictive covenants and ordinary course requirements.
– Disallowing audits: Require audit rights, independent accountant review, and a dispute resolution path.
– Tying earnout to non‑financial or easily manipulated metrics: Prefer objective financial metrics or ensure strong governance and transparency.
– Ignoring tax consequences: Get a tax opinion and structure payment timing/allocation to achieve intended tax treatment.

Dispute resolution — recommended approach
1. Early resolution mechanics: escalation path internal to buyer/seller teams with a fixed deadline.
2. Independent expert determination: A neutral accounting or industry expert to compute disputed amounts.
3. Binding arbitration for final disputes: Faster and private relative to litigation; select rules and seat suitable to both parties.
4. Avoid open-ended litigation clauses and allow for interim injunctive relief if one party threatens to frustrate earnout.

When to use alternatives to earnouts
– Use holdbacks if the buyer is primarily concerned about post‑closing indemnity risk rather than performance upside.
– Use price adjusment mechanics based on working capital or other standard post‑closing adjustments when buyer concerns are limited to routine accounting or balance sheet items.
– Consider seller financing, contingent notes, or equity rollover if alignment of long-term ownership/returns is the goal.

Checklist — closing and post‑closing monitoring
Before closing
– Ensure earnout terms are fully documented and agreed upon.
– Obtain valuation support for contingent consideration for accounting/tax records.
– Agree on the accounting policies and retain supporting schedules.
– Put escrow/security arrangements in place if required.
– Add required covenants and employee agreements to the purchase documents.

After closing
– Set up reporting cadence and templates (monthly/quarterly/annual).
– Schedule independent audit or review procedures.
– Track key metrics and maintain contemporaneous records supporting calculations.
– Monitor compliance with covenants (ordinary course, employee retention).
– Prepare for potential disputes with documented evidence and retained expert contacts.

The bottom line
Earnouts are powerful deal tools for bridging valuation gaps and aligning incentives, but they introduce complexity and potential conflict. Success depends on clear metric definitions, robust governance and reporting, predictable accounting and tax treatment, and fair dispute-resolution mechanisms. Both buyers and sellers should involve experienced M&A, accounting and tax advisors to draft tailored, enforceable earnout provisions that balance risk sharing with practical enforceability.

Selected sources and further reading
– Investopedia — “Earnout” (Michela Buttignol): https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/earnout.asp
– Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance — “The Enduring Allure and Perennial Pitfalls of Earnouts”
– KPMG — guidance on business combinations and contingent consideration (ASC 805 / IFRS 3 commentary)
– BDO (UK) — “Earnouts: Everything You Need to Know”
– The Hartford Business Owner’s Playbook — “Earn-Outs and Contingent Payments”
– TechCrunch / Electronic Arts press release — “EA Buys PopCap Games for as Much as $1.3B”
– Breaking Into Wall Street — Earnout modeling tutorial (practical modeling guidance)
(Note: consult your legal, accounting and tax advisors for advice tailored to your transaction and jurisdiction.)

Key Takeaways
– An earnout is contingent consideration in an acquisition that pays the seller additional amounts if future, contractually specified performance targets are met.
– Earnouts bridge valuation gaps, share risk between buyer and seller, and can align incentives, but they commonly produce post-closing disputes if not carefully drafted.
– Key structuring choices include the performance metrics, measurement and accounting conventions, length of the earnout, payment form (cash vs. stock), governance and information rights, and dispute-resolution mechanisms.
– Accounting and tax treatment depend on classification: under IFRS and US GAAP contingent consideration is generally measured at fair value at acquisition (with different subsequent treatments), but amounts paid as compensation for post-acquisition services are expensed; for tax purposes earnouts can be ordinary income or capital gains based on how they are characterized.
– Practical negotiation, drafting, modeling, monitoring and dispute-avoidance steps substantially increase the chance that an earnout will deliver the intended economic outcome.

Understanding an Earnout
An earnout is a contractual mechanism used in mergers and acquisitions that ties part of the purchase price to the future performance of the acquired business. Instead of all cash (or other consideration) being paid at closing, the buyer pays a contingent portion only if the business achieves agreed metrics—revenue, gross sales, EBITDA, net income, customer retention, product milestones, etc.—within a defined measurement period.

Why parties use earnouts
– Bridge valuation gap: Sellers who want a higher price and buyers who are unwilling to pay upfront can split the difference via contingent payments.
– Risk-sharing: Buyer reduces upfront exposure; seller shares upside if the business performs.
– Incentive alignment: Keeping sellers and key managers engaged after closing by making them beneficiaries of future success.
– Tax timing: For sellers, deferring payment over years can smooth tax liabilities (but tax treatment depends on classification).

Common problems
Earnouts are frequently the subject of post-closing disputes over metric definitions, accounting methods, allowed adjustments, and management actions (e.g., whether the buyer took steps that diminished earnout performance). Clear drafting and governance reduce—but do not eliminate—this risk.

Structuring an Earnout — Elements to Define
1. Performance metric(s)
– Single metric (e.g., revenue, EBITDA) or a basket (e.g., revenue + adjusted EBITDA + customer retention).
– Metric should be measurable, objective, and difficult to manipulate.
2. Measurement period
– Typical periods: 1–3 years; can be longer in certain industries (e.g., biotech product milestones).
3. Calculation methodology
– Define exact accounting policies (GAAP, IFRS, or specified adjustments) and whether there are permitted accruals, reserves, or normalizing adjustments.
4. Payments and timing
– Lump-sum or periodic payments, cash vs. stock, caps, floors, and payment mechanics.
5. Governance, duties and operational scope
– Define seller’s post-closing role, authority, and any restrictions on buyer actions that could affect earnout outcomes.
6. Information and audit rights
– Seller’s access to books, right to audit or review earnout calculations, timing for statements and payment.
7. Anti-manipulation and covenants
– Buyer covenants to run the business in the ordinary course or to avoid actions intended to depress earnout results.
8. Remedies and dispute resolution
– Procedures for resolving calculation disputes: independent accounting expert, arbitration, or litigation.
9. Termination and acceleration events
– Treatment if key employees depart, if there is a change of control, or if the business is wound down.
10. Security and escrow
– Escrow or holdback amounts to secure representations/warranties vs. earnout is usually separate from indemnity escrow.

Practical Steps to Negotiate and Draft an Earnout
Step 1 — Clarify the purpose
– Are you using the earnout to resolve a valuation gap, to incentivize post-sale performance, or both? The purpose guides metric selection and governance terms.

Step 2 — Select appropriate metrics
– Choose metrics that reflect value drivers and can’t be easily manipulated.
– Prefer top-line (revenue, bookings) for product-sales businesses; use adjusted EBITDA or gross profit where margin management matters.
– Consider compound metrics (e.g., revenue growth + customer retention) to avoid single-metric gaming.

Step 3 — Specify accounting rules and adjustments
– Explicitly state which accounting standards apply and provide a list of permitted add-backs or adjustments (e.g., non-recurring expenses, related-party charges, or changes in allocation policies).
– Limit managerial discretion to make subjective adjustments unilaterally.

Step 4 — Define the seller’s post-closing role, responsibilities and authority
– Tie the seller’s obligations (time commitment, reporting, decision rights) to earnout triggers; include retention bonuses or employment agreements where appropriate.

Step 5 — Model scenarios and sensitivities
– Both parties should run best, base, and downside cases for the earnout payout under different assumptions.
– Use waterfall schedules to show how payments would flow under realistic outcomes.

Step 6 — Decide on payment mechanics and security
– Establish timing and form (cash, stock, options) and whether payments are subject to escrow or secured by a note.
– Consider caps, minimums, collars, and how partial achievement is calculated (pro rata, thresholds, step functions).

Step 7 — Include robust information, audit and dispute procedures
– Require timely earnout reports; allow independent accounting review; specify a neutral adjudicator for disputes (accounting firm or arbitrator).

Step 8 — Address employee departures and change-of-control
– Specify how departures of key personnel affect the earnout (e.g., acceleration, partial forfeiture, or substitution mechanisms).

Step 9 — Obtain tax and accounting advice early
– Characterization affects liabilities for both sides—consult tax counsel and accountants to anticipate consequences and structure the agreement optimally.

Step 10 — Document and test
– Have counsel draft detailed, unambiguous language and run example calculations as annexes to the agreement to remove ambiguity.

Model Example — Simple Numerical Illustration
Hypothetical deal:
– Purchase price: $1,000,000 upfront + 20% of annual EBITDA above $200,000 for Years 1–2 post-closing.
Year 1: EBITDA = $300,000 → Excess = $100,000 → Earnout = 20% × $100,000 = $20,000
Year 2: EBITDA = $250,000 → Excess = $50,000 → Earnout = $10,000
Total additional paid = $30,000
Notes:
– Define precisely which items constitute EBITDA and what adjustments are allowed (one-time charges, owner compensation normalization, etc.).

Practical Contract Clauses (topics, not verbatim drafting)
– Definition of Measurement Period(s)
– Definition of Performance Metric(s) and Calculation Examples
– Accounting Policies and Permitted Adjustments Schedule
– Seller Obligations and Performance Covenants
– Buyer Covenants (e.g., “ordinary course” requirement)
– Reporting, Notices and Audit Rights
– Escrow/Security for Earnout Payment (if any)
– Dispute Resolution Mechanism (expert determination/arbitration)
– Change-of-Control, Termination, Forfeiture, and Acceleration Provisions

Advantages and Disadvantages — Detailed View
Advantages for Buyers
– Less upfront cash outlay and downside protection if business underperforms.
– Time to integrate acquired business before paying full consideration.
– Potential to motivate seller to ensure successful transition and sustained performance.

Advantages for Sellers
– Upside capture if the business continues to grow.
– Continued involvement can yield a higher total sale price.
– Possible tax deferral across years (depending on classification).

Disadvantages for Buyers
– Ongoing relationship with sellers that can complicate integration.
– Administrative burden and accounting complexity of contingent consideration.
– Risk of sellers manipulating results if earnout duties are not carefully limited.

Disadvantages for Sellers
– Payment uncertainty—may receive less than expected.
– Limited control post-closing; buyer may change strategy in ways that hinder earnout achievement.
– Potential for long, costly disputes over calculations or conduct.

How Earnouts Are Treated for Accounting Purposes
IFRS (IFRS 3 Business Combinations)
– Contingent consideration is recognized at fair value on the acquisition date as part of the consideration transferred. If it’s considered part of the purchase price, it increases goodwill or reduces any gain on bargain purchase.
– If a contingent payment is actually remuneration for post-acquisition services, it’s not part of consideration; instead it’s accounted for as post-combination expense when incurred.

US GAAP (ASC 805)
– Contingent consideration is recognized at fair value on the acquisition date. If classified as a liability, subsequent fair value changes generally hit earnings; if classified as equity, subsequent changes are not remeasured through earnings.
– Like IFRS, amounts representing compensation for post-acquisition services are expensed.

Practical implications
– The accounting classification affects earnings volatility after the acquisition and balance-sheet presentation.
– Early engagement with accountants is essential to decide appropriate measurement and disclosure.

How Are Earnout Agreements Taxed?
Tax treatment depends heavily on transaction structure and characterization:
– If earnout is treated as part of the purchase price for an asset sale or stock sale, it typically is capital gain to the seller (timing and allocation rules apply) and reduces the buyer’s basis allocation among acquired assets.
– If payments are compensation for services (for example, payments contingent on seller working post-closing), they are ordinary income to the seller and deductible to the buyer as compensation.
– Installment sale rules and specific tax elections (e.g., Section 338 elections in U.S. tax law) can materially change outcomes.
– State and international tax issues can also arise for cross-border deals.

Recommendation
– Consult tax advisors early in negotiations to structure the earnout and documentation to align tax positions with commercial objectives (and explicitly record tax characterizations in the agreement when possible).

Earnout vs Holdback — Key Differences
– Earnout: contingent on achieving future performance targets; designed to pay additional consideration if the business does well.
– Holdback: amount retained from purchase price to secure indemnities, tax contingencies or adjustments; usually not tied to future operating performance (and typically returned if no claims arise).
– A deal can include both mechanisms.

Real-World Examples
1) Electronic Arts / PopCap (2011)
– EA’s acquisition of PopCap included an upfront payment and a multi-year earnout tied to non-GAAP EBIT targets. The structure allowed EA to avoid paying the full maximum unless PopCap achieved specified earnings growth (TechCrunch; EA press releases).
2) Common patterns in tech deals
– Buyers often structure earnouts around revenue targets, user growth, or retention metrics in consumer tech, or regulatory/clinical milestones in life sciences.
3) Hypothetical SaaS earnout
– Purchase price = $5M upfront + additional payments if ARR (annual recurring revenue) grows above specified thresholds across two years, with payments decreasing if churn increases.

Dispute Prevention and Resolution — Best Practices
– Use objective, externally verifiable metrics and define measurement mechanics with examples and a calculation worksheet in the agreement.
– Require buyer to operate the business in the ordinary course and avoid major strategic shifts that undermine earnout achievement unless mutually agreed.
– Include audit rights and timelines for disputing calculations (e.g., 60 days to raise claims after provision of earnout statement).
– Appoint an independent accounting expert to resolve disputes, and limit discovery to core accounting issues to keep resolution efficient.
– Consider a capped fee arrangement for dispute resolution to control costs.

Integration and Governance During the Earnout Period
– Maintain a clear integration plan that identifies responsibilities and decision rights for seller-management vs. buyer leadership.
– Set up a periodic reporting cadence focused on earnout metrics; use rolling forecasts and dashboards to reduce surprises.
– Include KPIs and early-warning triggers so seller and buyer can collaborate to address performance shortfalls quickly.

Practical Checklist for Buyers and Sellers
– Buyer: Ensure covenants prevent adverse actions, get rights to monitor metrics, define permitted adjustments, and consider escrow/security for payments.
– Seller: Seek clear metric definitions, limits on buyer discretion, audit rights, protections for key employees, and acceleration triggers on change-of-control.
– Both parties: Run modeling scenarios, involve tax/accounting counsel, and set an explicit dispute-resolution path.

Additional Considerations and Industry Variations
– Life sciences and R&D-intensive deals often use milestone-based earnouts tied to regulatory approvals rather than accounting metrics.
– Service businesses may use customer retention or gross margin targets.
– Cross-border deals add currency, withholding and foreign tax complexity; plan for withholding, reporting, and treaty implications.

Concluding Summary
Earnouts are a flexible and widely used tool in acquisitions to allocate risk, bridge valuation gaps, and align incentives. They can be powerful when well-designed but are a frequent source of tension post-closing if contractual language leaves room for interpretation or buyer actions can affect the outcome. The keys to success are clear, objective metric definitions; specified accounting rules and permitted adjustments; governance that balances buyer control with protections against manipulation; robust reporting and audit rights; and practical, pre-agreed dispute-resolution mechanisms. Early involvement of legal, accounting and tax advisors and scenario modeling by both sides will materially improve the likelihood that the earnout achieves its commercial purpose.

Selected sources and further reading
– Investopedia: “Earnout” (Michela Buttignol)
– Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance: “The Enduring Allure and Perennial Pitfalls of Earnouts”
– KPMG and BDO guidance on contingent consideration and accounting
– The Hartford Business Owner’s Playbook: “Earn-Outs and Contingent Payments”
– TechCrunch and EA press releases on the Electronic Arts / PopCap transaction

For deal-specific structuring, accounting or tax advice, consult experienced M&A counsel, accountants and tax advisors.

[[END]]